Hindu Rashtra is the goal of Hindu nationalist politics, which is also called as Hindutva. In contrast to Hinduism, Hindutva is a politics of in the name of Hinduism with Brahmanism as the core of the same. In nutshell Hindutva is a politics based on Brahmanical values of caste and gender hierarchy. The concept of Hindutva-Hindu nation is a modern one, which developed as a parallel to Islamic nationalism, and in opposition to the concept of Indian Nationalism. Indian nationalism developed during colonial period as the inclusive nationalism of people of all religions, different castes, languages and regions based on values of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.
Hindu nationalism developed from the section of Hindu landlords and kings with associated clergy on their side. As Indian nationalism was arguing for equalityof all the people, the previous ruling classes, felt threatened socially. Now their social privileges were under threat and so they gave a war cry of ‘Hinduism in danger’. This was a cry which was similar to the slogan of Muslim landlords and nawabs, who when their social status started declining; shouted ‘Islam in danger’.
Hindu Nationalism harped on the ancient glory of the times of Manusmriti and Vedas where the caste system was deeply entrenched in society. While national movement was articulating the need for land reforms, though they could never be properly implemented, Hindu nationalism harped on the earlier systems and was hiding its agenda of social inequality. It called for revival of a glorious period, despite the fact that the condition of women and dalits in those times were abysmal.
The needs of majority of Hindus were expressed in the national movement, which strove for democratic norms and its values got enshrined in Indian Constitution in the form of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. The Hindu nationalists were opposed to these values and also the formation of Indian Constitution, which not only stands for liberation of all people from feudal bondages, it is a path of liberation of large sections of Hindus, barring of course the upper caste ones’, who stand to lose their primacy. Most of the Hindus participated in the freedom struggle while a handful of them wedded to ideology of Hindu Rashtra kept aloof from this massive process which was to pave the path of liberation of all the people including majority of Hindus.
Those standing for cause of majority of Hindus opposed the idea of Hindu Rashtra. Ambedkar points out, “It is a pity that Mr. Jinnah should have become a votary and champion of Muslim Nationalism at a time when the whole world is decrying against the evils of nationalism… But isn’t there enough that is common to both Hindus and Musalmans, which if developed, is capable of moulding them into one people?… If Hindu Raj does become a fact, it will, no doubt, be the greatest calamity for this country…’ Compare the Sangh Parivar’s view of nationalism with these two conceptions and draw your own conclusions. (https://www.kractivist.org/tag/history/)
Gandhi the greatest Hindu of his times pointed out, "In India, for whose fashioning I have worked all my life, every man enjoys equality of status, whatever his religion is. The state is bound to be wholly secular", and, "religion is not the test of nationality but is a personal matter between man and God, and," religion is a personal affair of each individual, it must not be mixed up with politics or national affairs" (Harijan August 31, 1947)
After Independence, the followers of Hindu nationalists were very small and they kept working for breaking the core pillar of Indian nationalism, Fraternity. They kept spreading hatred against religious minorities. This hatred became the foundation of communal violence in times to come. While majority Hindus were going along with the national policies for building modern India through modern education and modern industries, the Hindu nationalists were criticizing and opposing these policies all through. While the majority of Hindus are faced with the problems of bread butter shelter employment and dignity, Hindu nationalists have been raising the emotive issues to divide the society along religious lines. The result is that in the din of hysteria, in the name of Hinduism and Hindus; they have been sidetracking the real issues of Hindus and substituting them with identity issues.
When BJP led NDA came to power it opened the path of restoring blind faith by introducing courses like Paurohitya (priesthood) and Karmakand (ritualism). Hindus need to be liberated from the clutches of blind faith while these policies are intensifying the retrograde, obscurantist values and undermining the real needs of average Hindus as well.
Last three years (since 2014) Modi-BJP-RSS government has come to power; the identity issues have been hiked up. Attempts have been made to undermine and bypass the issues related to Rights for food, education and health. The attempt was made to grab farmer’s land in the name of land reforms; somehow they could not succeed in that. The attempt to bring in land reform legislation was against interests of Hindus so to say. The labor reforms brought by Hindu nationalists have ruined the lives of workers at large. De-monitisation was propagated as a blow to black money holders, but its real victims have been average Hindus, who have suffered in silence. A series of emotive issues are dominating the social scene, Ram Temple, Bharat mata ki jia, Vande matram, Cow protection, Love Jihad and Ghar vapasi among other. The vigilante culture is getting promoted due to Hindu nationalist agenda. The beneficiaries of these policies have been affluent corporate sector, section of upper and middle classes while average Hindus are suffering the pain and anguish.
The society is suffering as age old values of love and amity are being demolished; the issues of poverty, illiteracy, hunger and health are being relegated to the margins of policy making. All this is against the interests of Hindus at large. Average Hindus are a big victim of this agenda.
“ … હવે પછી કોઈને સ્વેચ્છાએ જોડણી કરવાનો અધિકાર નથી.” − ગાંધીજીનું આ વાક્ય પહેલે જ પાને મુકાયું છે; અરે, આરંભથી આવૃત્તિઓમાં ય મુકાતું રહ્યું છે. અહીં તો ગાંધીજીને આ સંવર્ધિત આવૃત્તિ અર્પણ પણ થઈ છે. લખાણ આમ છે : ‘જેમની ઉજ્જવળ પ્રવૃત્તિથી ભાષાનું તેજ પ્રગટ્યું છે અને જેમની પ્રેરણાથી આ કોશ તૈયાર થયો છે, તે પૂજ્ય ગાંધીજીને ચરણે આ કોશ અર્પણ કરીએ છીએ.’
વિમોચનના પ્રાસંગિક પ્રવચનમાં ચંદ્રકાંત શેઠે કોશની કામગીરી દરમિયાન પડેલી મુશ્કેલીમાં સારા પ્રૂફરીડર મળતા ન હોવાની ફરિયાદ કરીને પ્રૂફરીડરોને સારું વળતર આપવું જોઈએ એવી અપીલ કરી. શેઠસાહેબ પ્રત્યે ભારોભાર આદર છે ને એમની ફરિયાદ પણ સોળ અાની સાચી છે. પણ સારા પ્રૂફરીડર મળતા કેમ નથી? આ જાતિ લુપ્ત કેમ થઈ ને કોણે કરી? વગેરે કારણો વધુ મહત્ત્વનાં છે.
મધ્યયુગી યુરોપમાં જ્યારે સામંતવાદી સમાજ વ્યવસ્થા એની સરગર્મી ઉપર હતી ત્યારે એના વિદ્રોહમાં લોકશાહીનો જન્મ થયો હતો. લોકશાહીનો પાયાનો આદર્શ બરાબરી અને એકજાતનો છે. સ્કૂલોમાં જે યુનિફોર્મનો નિયમ છે તે આ લોકતાંત્રિક વ્યવસ્થાનું પ્રતીક છે. જ્યાં દરેક વિદ્યાર્થી, સામાજિક ઊંચાઇ કે નીચાઇ છતાં, સમાન નજર આવે છે.